GolfPad Tags + The app knows where your ball went. Tags know what you hit. Below is what each half is worth on its own, and what happens when AVA prices the pair.
FREE FOR 14 DAYS · CARD REQUIRED · CANCEL ANY TIME
One hole, two readouts
Both columns describe the same nine minutes of golf. The left one is accurate and complete. The right one is the one you can act on.
The tracker on its own A faithful record of what happened, and no opinion about which part of it mattered.
The same hole, read by AVA The finding
You blamed the putts. The hole was lost by one SW from 19 yards, which cost 2.0 strokes on its own. Nothing on a scorecard shows you that shot.
Three setups, side by side
GolfPad Tags are RFID: no tap, no menu, the club is simply on the shot. Everything below turns on whether it is there.
Scroll the table →
| Capability | GolfPad app | GolfPad + Tags | GolfPad + Tags + AVA |
|---|---|---|---|
| Score, fairways, greens, putt count | Recorded | Recorded | Recorded |
| Shot locations and hole context | Recorded | Recorded | Recorded |
| Club on most shots | Not recorded | Recorded automatically | Recorded |
| Every shot priced in strokes vs scratch | No | No | By category, hole by hole |
| Putting strokes gained | No | Putter logged, not priced | Yes, with the sensors |
| Which two or three things to practise | You decide | You decide | Ranked by what it cost you |
| Measured yardages checked against the course | Profile distances only | Profile distances only | Course vs practice, as a finding |
| Rounds and range sessions on one timeline | No | No | Scored the same way |
| Instruction matched to the leak | No | No | Top 100 teaching pros |
Without Tags AVA works from scores, hole context and shot locations, and that is still enough to find where rounds break. With a club on most of your shots, 'you miss greens' becomes 'take one more club from 150'. A chip played with the bag twenty yards away, a re-hit or a shot with the phone out of range still arrives bare, and AVA has less to say about those.
What you get back
Real charts from the app. The first two get sharper once the club is attached to the shot; the third works from scores alone.
Swipe →
Personalized progression
Finding the leak is half of it. AVA matches what your rounds exposed to lessons from nationally ranked teaching professionals, and rebuilds the playlist as your game moves. No lesson fees, no drill library to search.
4 lessons · 31 min
Matched because you hit 2 of 7 fairways. Everything the approach numbers below cost you started here, on a lie you did not choose.
Matched because ten of your sixteen approaches were played from rough, and the 225+ yard band cost −2.7 on its own.
Two approaches this round flew roughly fifty yards past the distance you were playing to. Your watch measures total distance, ball to ball — this is the session that reconciles it with the card.
The drill that closes the loop: a structured block you can log, so next week AVA can tell you whether it worked.
Lessons are selected against the leak your own data exposed. You do not search a library and guess which video applies to you.
When the most expensive thing in your game stops being the most expensive thing, the playlist changes to whatever is.
Instruction from nationally ranked teachers is part of the $25 a month, not an upsell inside it.
Connect once
GolfPad rounds come in by link. Open the round you want, paste its share link into onboarding, and every tracked shot comes back priced in strokes gained against a scratch baseline.
Start for freeYour rounds stay yours. AVA reads them and never writes back to GolfPad, nothing is shared with a coach, a club or anyone else unless you send them a link, and you can export or delete everything whenever you want.
Copy the share link from GolfPad into onboarding. Thirty seconds, and you only learn it once.
Strokes gained by category against a scratch baseline, hole by hole.
The two or three things worth your next bucket of balls, ranked by what they cost you.
Free 14 days · Then $25/mo · One plan, every source included
GOLFPAD TAGS + AVA GOLF
Look at the approach chart above: nine of sixteen tracked approaches finished off the green, and these were not near misses — they averaged around fifty-five yards from the pin. Ten of the sixteen were played out of rough. That is not a strike fault and it is not variance.
It is a yardage habit. The number you are playing to is not the number that club produces out of that lie, so two of these flew roughly fifty yards through the green and most of the rest finished short and wide of it. Two or three times a round, every round, for years.
Without club data, AVA can only tell you that your approach play is expensive. With it, the finding becomes 'your 7-iron out of the rough finishes 20 yards left, take the wedge and get back in play'. A description turns into an instruction.
Manual shot logging fails the same way for everybody: you record the interesting shots and skip the routine ones, which biases the whole sample toward drama.
Tags remove the decision. Every shot is captured whether it was memorable or not, and the boring ones are exactly where the strokes leak, because a habit is by definition unremarkable.
This is why club-level findings from a tagged season are trustworthy and findings from a hand-logged season often aren't. Partial club data looks like a pattern when it is really a sampling bias, and AVA would rather tell you it doesn't know.
The most common self-diagnosis in amateur golf is a driving problem. Club-level data usually disagrees, and it disagrees in a useful way.
Off the tee, the cost concentrates in a handful of holes where the trouble is genuinely reachable, and the fix is a club choice, not a swing change. The round above says it plainly: the 3-wood off the 1st cost −0.25 and found rough, the six iron played out of that rough went out of bounds for one penalty stroke and −2.00, and two fairways from seven left ten of sixteen approaches coming out of rough.
AVA prices that decision hole by hole, which turns an argument about your swing into a plan for your tee shots. It is the fastest scoring change available to most golfers and it needs no practice at all.
Aim to. Completeness is what makes club-level findings trustworthy: partial coverage looks like a pattern when it's really a sampling bias, and AVA will hold back a finding rather than draw it from half a bag.
Which club produced each miss it caught. That converts 'your approach play costs you five shots a round' into 'your 7-iron out of the rough finishes 20 yards left'.
The same way as any GolfPad round: paste its shareable round link into AVA and the analysis comes back. The club data from the tags comes with it, which is what makes the findings club-specific.
They're RFID and read by your phone as you pull the club, so there's nothing to charge and nothing to remember on the first tee. The phone does have to be near the club to read the tag, so a chip played with the bag left twenty yards away can still arrive without one.
Especially then. Practice data gives you your ceiling per club; Tags give you what that club does on real turf under real pressure. The gap between the two is one of the most useful numbers in your profile.
14 days free · One price · Everything included
Free for 14 days, then $25 a month. One plan: no tiers, no add-ons, nothing to unlock later. Every source you connect is included.
Start for FreeOwn a different GolfPad? See the GolfPad overview.
